Declassified UFO / UAP Document
UFO Flaps: An Analysis
AI-Generated Summary
This paper analyzes various theories regarding UFO 'flaps' or 'waves' and concludes that they are not correlated with external events like atomic tests or planetary cycles. Instead, the author argues that these waves are best explained by psychological and sociological factors, particularly paranoid ideation and collective shame.
In 'UFO Flaps: An Analysis,' Martin Kottmeyer examines the phenomenon of 'flaps' or 'waves'—periods of accelerated UFO reporting—to determine if they are driven by external realities or internal human factors. Kottmeyer begins by noting that the term 'flap' itself carries psychological connotations, as defined by Capt. Edward Ruppelt of Project Blue Book. He systematically critiques various theories that attempt to explain these waves. The 'Reconnaissance Theory,' which posits that UFOs are monitoring atomic bomb developments, is dismissed due to a lack of correlation between test dates and reporting surges. Similarly, the 'Martian Hypothesis,' which suggests waves peak when Mars is closest to Earth, is shown to be unsupported by data, with researchers like Jacques Vallee and Charles H. Smiley providing evidence against it. Mathematical models based on cycles are also analyzed and found wanting, as predictions based on these cycles consistently fail to materialize. The author then explores sociological and psychological explanations, including 'silly season' theories (media-driven), 'crisis theories' (societal stress), and 'mass hysteria.' While acknowledging that media coverage can influence reporting, Kottmeyer argues that peak media coverage often lags behind peak UFO numbers, suggesting that media does not initiate the waves. He also critiques the application of crisis theory, noting that major crises, such as the Cuban Missile Crisis, actually saw a drop in UFO reports. Ultimately, Kottmeyer proposes that the UFO mythos is deeply rooted in paranoid ideation and collective shame. He suggests that UFO reports are a form of collective reaction to societal stressors, where the perception of being watched or threatened is projected onto the UFO phenomenon. He concludes that while multi-factor approaches might offer better insights, the current evidence points toward a psychological origin rather than an external, physical one, and calls for further research into the dynamics of paranoia and collective shame as drivers of these waves.
The presence of two terms to denote these times of accelerated ufo reporting behavior reflect the absence of consensus in ufology's attempts to understand what is behind the simple arithmetical truth that ufo numbers change rather than remain constant over time.
PDF not loading? Download the PDF directly
Official Assessment
The author argues that UFO 'flaps' or 'waves' do not correlate with external events like atomic tests, planetary cycles, or media coverage, and suggests that sociological and psychological factors, specifically paranoia and collective shame, are more likely explanations for the phenomenon.
Key Persons
- Edward RuppeltCapt. of Project Blue Book
- Donald KeyhoeProminent spokesman for the Reconnaissance Theory
- Loren GrossUFO historian
- Jacques ValleeResearcher/Theorist
- Charles H. SmileyChairman of the Department of Astronomy at Brown University