A Golden Age of General Relativity? Some remarks on the history of general relativity.

This academic paper by Hubert Goenner examines the historiography of general relativity, specifically challenging the common narrative that the field experienced a 'low water mark' between 1925 and 1955, followed by a 'Golden Age' or 'Renaissance' between 1960 and 1975. Goenner argues that these labels are problematic and rely on weak empirical evidence. He contends that the perceived decline in the mid-20th century is a projection from the present, and that the subsequent growth was not a sudden resurrection but rather a result of broader trends in physics, including increased military and private funding, the expansion of university research, and the birth of relativistic astrophysics. The author analyzes various activity indicators, such as the number of PhDs produced, the volume of publications, and the frequency of international conferences. He notes that while there was a significant increase in activity during the 1960s and 1970s, this was largely due to external factors like the 'Sputnik-shock' and the availability of new funding sources, rather than an internal conceptual breakthrough that suddenly made general relativity a mainstream subject. Goenner emphasizes that general relativity remained a relatively small field, or 'Little Science,' throughout much of the 20th century. He also points out that many of the key predictions of general relativity, such as gravitational waves, were not experimentally verified until decades after the supposed 'Golden Age,' further complicating the narrative of a sudden renaissance. Ultimately, the paper calls for more caution in using such historiographic catchwords and suggests that the history of general relativity is more complex and continuous than these simplified labels imply.