Declassified UFO / UAP Document

Project 10073 Record — Sighting in San Pablo, California, 7 August 1965

📅 7 August 1965 📍 San Pablo, California 🏛 Photo Analysis Division, TDDPA 📄 Sighting report and photo analysis

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

A civilian reported a UFO sighting in San Pablo, California, and submitted 8mm film for analysis. Air Force photo analysts concluded the film was a double exposure showing a man in a suit, not an unidentified aerial phenomenon.

This document details the investigation of a UFO sighting reported on 7 August 1965 by a civilian in San Pablo, California. The witness, while driving between San Pablo and Oakland, observed a square, light-colored object against the blue sky for approximately 20 minutes. The witness described the object as having a tail larger than an airplane and noted that it moved slowly at first before moving away very fast. The witness submitted an 8mm movie film of the event to the Air Force for analysis. The film was initially received by Hamilton Air Force Base and subsequently forwarded to the Air Force (FTD) at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base for expert evaluation. The Photo Analysis Division (TDDPA) and the Photo Processing Division (TDDPP) conducted a thorough examination of the film. Their analysis concluded that the film was a double exposure. Specifically, the images that the witness believed to be a UFO were identified as being part of a larger image showing the top half of a man in a suit coat, with light-toned areas corresponding to a shirt and collar. The report notes that while the double exposure was most evident in the section of the film showing the sky, it was likely present throughout a major portion of the footage. The investigators determined that the phenomenon was a double exposure rather than a reflection, citing the lack of distortion and the fact that the image was not reversed. Consequently, the official conclusion was that the film failed to reveal any discernible image that could be classified as a UFO. The film was returned to the witness following the completion of the analysis.

A careful examination of the 8 MM film failed to reveal any discernible image that could be classed as a UFO.

Official Assessment

Although a double exposure can only be seen on the section of film showing the sky, it is felt that a major portion of the 8 MM film has been double exposed. The phenomenon of the second set of images is felt to be a double exposure rather than a reflection because of the lack of distortion to the image and the appearance of the image not being reversed. A careful examination of the 8 MM film failed to reveal any discernible image that could be classed as a UFO.

The film was determined to be a double exposure. The images identified as a potential UFO were actually part of a larger image showing the top half of a man in a suit coat, with light-toned areas representing a shirt and collar.

Witnesses

Key Persons

Military Units