Declassified UFO / UAP Document
UFO Sighting Report - Sloan, Nevada, 20 March 1965
AI-Generated Summary
A 1965 UFO sighting report from Sloan, Nevada, was investigated by the Air Force. Photo analysis concluded the image was likely a photographic artifact caused by a drop of developer on the negative, rather than a genuine object.
This document details the investigation and photo analysis of a reported UFO sighting near Sloan, Nevada, on March 20, 1965. The witness, a civilian, claimed to have observed a hazy white, solid-looking object while driving on U.S. Highway 91. He reported that the object moved from southeast to northwest for approximately 20 seconds. The witness stopped his car, placed his camera on the hood, and took a photograph of the object just before it disappeared. The witness later submitted eight negatives and a print for investigation. The investigation, conducted by Captain Charles F. Reichmuth of the Space Systems Division (SSD), included an interrogation of the witness and a technical analysis of the photographic materials. The witness appeared to be a sincere individual, though he was unfamiliar with angular measurements and compass directions. The photo analysis, performed by the Foreign Technology Division (FTD) and SSD, concluded that the image was not a genuine solid object. Analysts noted that the edges of the object were not sharp, despite the background and foreground being in focus. Furthermore, there was no evidence of image motion or camera motion that would be expected given the object's reported speed. The consensus among the photo experts was that the 'UFO' image was likely caused by a drop of developer fluid on the negative, which was subsequently wiped off, creating a dark blob and a light trail. The report suggests this could have been an attempted hoax, noting that the witness had expressed interest in selling the picture to a publication. The original negatives and prints were returned to the witness without any official Air Force comment.
Image could be caused by a drop of developer on the emulsion, then wiped off.
PDF not loading? Download the PDF directly
Official Assessment
The image could be caused by a drop of developer on the emulsion, then wiped off.
Photo analysis indicated the image was likely a hoax or a photographic artifact. The edges of the object were not sharp, while the background and foreground were. No banding, lines, or detail were visible on the object to indicate it was solid. Experts at the SSD/Aerospace photo lab confirmed the UFO effect could be reproduced by a drop of developer on the negative.
Witnesses
Key Persons
- Major Quintanilla Jr.TDEW/UFO
- Eric T. de JonckheereColonel, USAF, Deputy for Technology and Subsystems
- William J. TriggLt. Colonel, USAF, Asst Deputy for Foreign Technology
- Robert L. BaseCaptain, USAF, Chief, Photo Analysis Division
- Wilber Price, Jr.Director, Photo Exploitation Directorate