Declassified UFO / UAP Document
Project 10073 Record — East Coast United States, 30 July 1965
AI-Generated Summary
A 1965 UFO sighting report over the US East Coast was evaluated by the Air Force's Electronics Directorate. They concluded the data was insufficient but suggested the radar returns were likely caused by anomalous atmospheric propagation.
This document is a Project 10073 record concerning a UFO sighting reported on 30 July 1965 at 1300Z over the East Coast of the United States. The report, initiated by the Foreign Technology Division, involves a civilian source who reported one or two objects tracked via ground radar. The initial request for radar analysis was processed by Major Hector Quintanilla, Jr., of the Aerial Phenomena Branch, and forwarded to the Electronics Directorate. Lt. Colonel John W. Vega of the Electronics Directorate concluded that the provided information was insufficient for a definitive analysis. He noted that a proper evaluation would require specific technical data, including radar types, operating frequencies, signal characteristics, and precise weather conditions. Regarding the target's behavior, the report notes that the radical changes in direction at the observed speeds are inconsistent with natural objects. Consequently, the Electronics Directorate suggested that the observations were likely the result of anomalous propagation of radar waves, a phenomenon known to occur under specific atmospheric conditions. The document includes correspondence between various military offices, including the Foreign Technology Division and NORAD, and was later declassified in 1969.
The motion of the target appears to rule out direct observation, as natural objects would not be able to change directions radically at the observed speeds.
PDF not loading? Download the PDF directly
Official Assessment
This leads one to believe that the observations were via anomalous propagation of the radar waves. When atmospheric conditions are right, anomalous propagations can play many tricks and, of course, are difficult to substantiate. This occurrence may be one of these cases; however, additional information could prove otherwise.
The Electronics Directorate determined that there was insufficient information to perform a proper radar analysis, specifically lacking data on radar types, frequencies, signal types, weather conditions, and precise target travel directions.