Declassified UFO / UAP Document
Investigation Report, UFO Sighting, 3 August 1965, Santa Ana, California
AI-Generated Summary
Rex Heflin reported a UFO sighting and provided Polaroid photographs in 1965. Military investigators concluded the photographs were a hoax after analysis suggested the object was a small, handheld item rather than a large craft.
This document is a comprehensive record of the investigation into a UFO sighting reported by Rex Heflin, a traffic investigator for the Orange County Road Department, on August 3, 1965, in Santa Ana, California. Heflin claimed to have observed and photographed a silver, circular object, approximately 30 feet in diameter, while driving on Myford Road. He reported that the object hovered, tilted, and then accelerated away, all within a 15-second period. Heflin took three Polaroid photographs of the object through his vehicle window. The investigation, conducted by Captain Charles F. Reichmuth of the Space Systems Division, involved multiple agencies, including the Marine Corps at El Toro and the Foreign Technology Division (FTD). The report details the chain of custody for the original photographs, which were passed between various military and civilian entities, including NORAD and the press, often without receipts. The investigation faced significant challenges, including discrepancies in Heflin's testimony and his reluctance to answer specific questions regarding the delay in reporting the sighting and the source of his prints. The FTD conducted a photo analysis, which concluded that the images did not match the reported visual conditions. A controlled test using a small, 9-inch object tossed in the air produced similar photographic results, leading investigators to conclude that the incident was likely a hoax. Despite these findings, the case generated significant media attention, with articles appearing in the Herald-Examiner and The Register. The document includes various internal memos, investigation reports, and copies of the press coverage, all documenting the military's attempt to verify the authenticity of the photographs and the eventual conclusion that the sighting was not genuine.
Photo analysis indicates that the pictures of the object did not represent the visual conditions of the sighting.
PDF not loading? Download the PDF directly
Official Assessment
Other (HOAX)
Photo analysis indicated the pictures did not represent the visual conditions of the sighting. Tests suggested the object in the photos was a small object (9 inches in diameter) tossed in the air, not a 30-foot craft.
Witnesses
- Rex HeflinTraffic InvestigatorOrange County Road Department
Key Persons
- Major QuintanillaFTD (TDEW) investigator
- Sarah HuntSAFOI, Washington DC