Declassified UFO / UAP Document
Symposium on Unidentified Flying Objects: Hearings before the Committee on Science and Astronautics, U.S. House of Representatives, Ninetieth Congress, Second Session, July 29, 1968
AI-Generated Summary
This document is a 1968 Congressional hearing transcript where six scientists presented evidence on UFOs to the House Committee on Science and Astronautics. The participants argued that the UFO phenomenon is a legitimate scientific subject that has been neglected due to ridicule and lack of funding, and they recommended a systematic, interdisciplinary approach to future research.
This document is the transcript of a symposium on Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs) held on July 29, 1968, before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Science and Astronautics. Chaired by Hon. J. Edward Roush, the session was convened to address the UFO phenomenon as a legitimate scientific problem rather than a matter of ridicule or national security threat. The committee invited six prominent scientists—Dr. J. Allen Hynek, Dr. James E. McDonald, Dr. Carl Sagan, Dr. Robert L. Hall, Dr. James A. Harder, and Dr. Robert M. L. Baker, Jr.—to provide their assessments of the data and to offer recommendations for future study. The speakers generally agreed that the scientific community had largely ignored the UFO phenomenon due to a lack of 'hard' data, the anecdotal nature of reports, and a prevailing scientific taboo. Dr. Hynek, a long-time consultant to the Air Force, emphasized that while many reports are misidentifications, a significant subset of puzzling cases reported by competent witnesses remains unexplained and warrants serious inquiry. Dr. McDonald argued that the UFO phenomenon is global and that the scientific community's dismissal of it as nonsense is a major error. He advocated for a more rigorous, systematic investigation. Dr. Sagan provided a broader perspective on the search for extraterrestrial intelligence, noting that while there is no persuasive evidence that UFOs are extraterrestrial, it is equally unproven that they are not. He suggested that if Congress were interested in the search for extraterrestrial life, it should support broader scientific programs. Dr. Hall, a sociologist, discussed the social-psychological aspects of the phenomenon, including the 'ridicule lid' that prevents witnesses from reporting sightings and the tendency for belief systems to form around the UFO topic. Dr. Harder and Dr. Baker focused on the technical and physical aspects, discussing the propulsion problems and the potential for scientific 'paydirt' in studying the phenomenon. The hearing concluded with a discussion on the need for better data collection, the potential for modifying existing radar systems to track anomalous objects, and the importance of maintaining an open, scientific attitude toward the subject.
Every great advance in science has issued from a new audacity of imagination.
PDF not loading? Download the PDF directly
Official Assessment
The symposium was convened to examine the UFO phenomenon as a scientific problem. The consensus among the invited scientists was that the phenomenon is worthy of serious, systematic, and well-funded scientific study, and that the current approach of ridicule and dismissal is counterproductive. Several scientists argued for the establishment of a scientific board of inquiry and for international cooperation in data collection.
Key Persons
- J. Edward RoushChairman of the symposium
- George P. MillerChairman of the Committee on Science and Astronautics
- J. Allen HynekHead, Department of Astronomy, Northwestern University
- James E. McDonaldSenior physicist, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, University of Arizona
- Carl SaganAssociate professor of astronomy, Cornell University
- Robert L. HallHead, Department of Sociology, University of Illinois
- James A. HarderAssociate professor of civil engineering, University of California
- Robert M. L. Baker, Jr.Senior scientist, Computer Sciences Corp.