Declassified UFO / UAP Document

AIRCRAFT DESIGN PROPOSED BY SQN. LDR. G.L. WALLER - FEASIBILITY STUDY

🏛 Aeronautical Research Laboratories 📄 correspondence and technical assessment

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

This document file contains the 1966 evaluation of an RAAF officer's proposed 'annular aerofoil' aircraft design. The Aeronautical Research Laboratories concluded the design lacked clear aerodynamic advantages over existing systems and recommended no further action.

This document collection details the administrative and technical evaluation of an aircraft design proposed by Squadron Leader G.L. Waller of the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) in early 1966. The proposal, titled 'Aircraft with Annular Aerofoil,' was submitted to the Department of Air and subsequently referred to the Department of Supply for a feasibility study. The design featured a circular body with a central rotating assembly, including a centrifugal fan, an annular aerofoil, and jet reaction devices intended to provide vertical and transitional flight capabilities. Squadron Leader Waller sought to patent the concept and requested an evaluation of the aerodynamic principles involved. The Department of Air, believing the invention might have military significance, requested that the Aeronautical Research Laboratories (ARL) conduct a detailed study. Correspondence between Waller, the Department of Air, and the Department of Supply shows that Waller met with ARL staff to discuss his ideas and provided patent specifications and schematic drawings. ARL conducted a technical review of the proposal, focusing on the aerodynamic properties of the annular aerofoil and the efficiency of the air generator system. Their assessment, dated May 20, 1966, concluded that the data provided was insufficient for a precise study but noted that the design did not appear to offer any obvious aerodynamic advantage over existing vertical lift systems. The Chief Superintendent of ARL, T.F.C. Lawrence, formally advised the Department of Air that no further action was required regarding the proposal. The file includes internal memoranda, letters of correspondence, patent application documents, and technical comments outlining the design's mechanics, such as the use of variable control vanes and the gyroscopic stability provided by the rotating components.

At this stage it is only possible to say, in view of the foregoing remarks, that there does not seem to be any obvious aerodynamic advantage in the proposal over systems obtaining lift by direct axial acceleration of a vertical jet.

Official Assessment

At this stage it is only possible to say, in view of the foregoing remarks, that there does not seem to be any obvious aerodynamic advantage in the proposal over systems obtaining lift by direct axial acceleration of a vertical jet.

The Aeronautical Research Laboratories concluded that the data provided by Squadron Leader Waller was inadequate for a precise feasibility study, and that the proposed design offered no clear aerodynamic advantage over existing vertical lift systems.

Key Persons

Military Units