Declassified UFO / UAP Document

AIRCRAFT DESIGN PROPOSED BY SQN.LDR.G.L.WALLER FEASIBILITY STUDY

🏛 Aeronautical Research Laboratories 📄 correspondence and technical assessment

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

This document records the 1966 evaluation of an RAAF officer's proposed 'annular aerofoil' aircraft design. The Aeronautical Research Laboratories concluded the design lacked aerodynamic advantages over existing systems and recommended no further action.

This document collection details the administrative and technical evaluation of an aircraft design proposed by Squadron Leader G.L. Waller of the RAAF in early 1966. The proposal, titled 'Aircraft with Annular Aerofoil,' was submitted to the Department of Air and subsequently referred to the Department of Supply's Aeronautical Research Laboratories (ARL) for a feasibility study. The correspondence tracks the formal request from the Department of Air, the internal coordination within the Department of Supply, and the eventual technical assessment conducted by ARL. Squadron Leader Waller, who had also filed patent applications for his design, engaged in discussions with the Chief Scientist and other officials to promote his concept. The design featured a circular body with a central rotating assembly, including a centrifugal fan, an annular aerofoil, and jet reaction devices intended to provide both vertical and transitional flight capabilities. ARL conducted a technical review of the provided data, which included patent specifications and schematic drawings. The technical comments, dated May 20, 1966, concluded that the data was insufficient for a precise study but noted that the design did not offer any obvious aerodynamic advantage over existing vertical lift systems. The report highlighted concerns regarding the efficiency of the fan and the potential for excessive weight. Following this assessment, the Chief Superintendent of ARL, T.F.C. Lawrence, advised the Department of Air that no further action was required regarding the proposal. The file includes internal memoranda, formal letters between departments, and the detailed provisional patent specification describing the mechanics of the proposed aircraft.

At this stage it is only possible to say, in view of the foregoing remarks, that there does not seem to be any obvious aerodynamic advantage in the proposal over systems obtaining lift by direct axial acceleration of a vertical jet.

Official Assessment

At this stage it is only possible to say, in view of the foregoing remarks, that there does not seem to be any obvious aerodynamic advantage in the proposal over systems obtaining lift by direct axial acceleration of a vertical jet.

The design proposed by Squadron Leader Waller was found to be aerodynamically inefficient compared to existing vertical lift systems. The Aeronautical Research Laboratories determined that the data provided was inadequate for a precise feasibility study, but technical analysis indicated that the annular aerofoil concept did not offer significant advantages.

Key Persons

Military Units