Declassified UFO / UAP Document
UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS - Report by the "Flying Saucer" Working Party
AI-Generated Summary
This 1951 British Ministry of Defence report concludes that UFO sightings are likely misidentifications, optical illusions, or hoaxes. It advises against further investigation of subjective reports, citing a lack of scientific evidence.
This document, dated June 1951, is a formal intelligence assessment produced by the British Ministry of Defence's Directorate of Scientific Intelligence and the Joint Technical Intelligence Committee. It serves as a report by the 'Flying Saucer' Working Party, tasked with evaluating the phenomenon of Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs). The report provides a historical overview, noting that sightings began in Sweden in 1946, followed by a surge in the United States in 1947 and the United Kingdom in 1950. The Working Party reviewed American investigations, specifically Projects 'Sign' and 'Grudge', noting that the U.S. authorities concluded that reported incidents were either misinterpretations of conventional objects, mass hysteria, or hoaxes. The British assessment includes detailed investigations into specific sightings in the United Kingdom, including radar reports at Tangmere and visual observations by R.A.F. personnel such as F/Lt. Hubbard. In each case, the Working Party concluded that the sightings were likely optical illusions or misidentifications of conventional aircraft. The report explicitly rejects the hypothesis of extraterrestrial origin, citing the lack of tangible evidence and the principle of parsimony (Occam's Razor). The Working Party recommends against further investigation of subjective reports, suggesting that resources should only be committed if a co-ordinated network of radar and photographic observation is established. The document includes two appendices: one detailing an analysis of an unusual radar response by Mr. G. E. Graham, and another recounting a sighting by Wing Commander Formby, which was ultimately identified as a normal aircraft.
We consider that no progress will be made by attempting further investigation of unco-ordinated and subjective evidence, and that positive results could only be obtained by organising throughout the country, or the world, continuous observation of the skies by a co-ordinated network of visual observers, equipped with photographic apparatus, and supplemented by a network of radar and sound locators.
PDF not loading? Download the PDF directly
Official Assessment
The phenomena are attributed to astronomical or meteorological phenomena, conventional aircraft, optical illusions, psychological delusions, or deliberate hoaxes.
The Working Party concluded that there is no scientific proof of extraterrestrial origin and that further investigation of subjective reports is a 'singularly profitless enterprise'.
Witnesses
Key Persons
- Dr. HynekAstronomer and consultant
- G. E. GrahamD.S.I. 1