Declassified UFO / UAP Document
Answer to Request of Speed Letter dated 30 January 1967
Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?
Across the Airwaves
You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.
AI-Generated Summary
This 1967 memorandum documents a technical analysis of UFO photographic prints. The author cautions that the analysis is limited by the poor quality of the copies and questions the accuracy of the underlying assumptions.
This memorandum, dated 21 February 1967, serves as a formal response to a request for information regarding a 'Speed Letter' dated 30 January 1967. The document details an analysis performed on photographic prints of a UFO. The author emphasizes that the analysis was constrained by the limited quality of the provided prints, noting that the conclusions drawn are based on copies rather than original negatives. The author warns that the copying process may have introduced distortions, and explicitly states that the accuracy of the assumptions used in the analysis is questionable. The document provides specific technical observations regarding the enlargement factors of the prints, noting that the total enlargement factor for prints one and three is the same, as is the factor for prints two and five. Furthermore, it is noted that the enlargement factor for prints one and three is approximately two times that of prints two and five. Regarding the findings, the author observes that the pattern of apparent grain clumping is similar in prints one and three compared to prints two and five, and that the edges of the UFO image appear more sharply defined in print one than in print three. The document concludes with a disclaimer regarding the reliability of these findings due to the nature of the source material.
The accuracy of these assumptions, however, is questionable.
Rendered preview of the original document image. Download original file
Official Assessment
The analysis was limited by the quality of the provided prints. The author notes that the conclusions are based on copies rather than originals, which may distort the imagery. The accuracy of the assumptions made regarding enlargement factors is questioned by the author.