Declassified UFO / UAP Document

UFO Observation Report — Glasgow AFB, Montana, 23-24 February 1967

📅 23-24 February 1967 📍 Glasgow AFB, Montana 🏛 Foreign Technology Division (FTD) 📄 sighting_report

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

Military personnel at Glasgow AFB reported two unidentified objects on 23-24 February 1967, which were also tracked on radar. The investigation was ultimately inconclusive due to conflicting witness reports and insufficient data.

This document collection details a UFO sighting incident at Glasgow Air Force Base, Montana, occurring on 23-24 February 1967. The report involves multiple military personnel, including TSgt Floyce L. Vaughn, SSgt David O. Hansen, A1C Stephen J. Marshall, and A2C Larry L. Miller, all from the 13th Fighter Interceptor Squadron. The observers reported seeing two distinct objects, which were also tracked on an MG-13 Fire Control System radar. The visual descriptions of the objects varied, with reports of flashing red, white, and blue lights, and sizes ranging from a 'pea' to a 'nickel.' One observer reported hearing a jet-type engine sound, while others did not. The investigation, conducted by the Foreign Technology Division (FTD) and Project Blue Book, was hampered by conflicting reports regarding the date of the sighting, the duration of the observation, and the number of objects involved. Tower personnel were contacted but reported negative air activity. The FTD, under Major Hector Quintanilla, Jr., repeatedly requested clarification and the completion of formal FTD Form 164 and AF Form 117 reports from the witnesses. The official conclusion reached by the Air Force was that the report was 'confusing' and contained 'insufficient data for evaluation.' The file includes meteorological data, including upper-air soundings, to assist in the analysis, though the final assessment remained inconclusive.

The report is of two separate visuals and a radar track. The report is confusing, does not have sufficient information to enable an evaluation; and is conflicting at points.

Official Assessment

Insufficient data for evaluation

The report was deemed confusing and conflicting, with two separate groups of personnel observing phenomena that may have been different objects. Radar data was insufficient for analysis.

Witnesses

Key Persons