Declassified UFO / UAP Document

Project 10073 Record: UFO Observation, 16 December 1966, Kettering, Ohio

📅 16 Dec 66 📍 Kettering, Ohio 🏛 U.S. Air Force 📄 Sighting report and correspondence

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

A 13-year-old witness in Kettering, Ohio, reported a slow-moving, white object with red lights on December 16, 1966. The Air Force determined the report contained insufficient data for a formal evaluation.

This document contains a U.S. Air Force record regarding a UFO sighting reported on December 16, 1966, in Kettering, Ohio. The primary record consists of a Project 10073 file, which includes a formal questionnaire completed by a 13-year-old civilian witness and a follow-up letter from Colonel Louis DeGOES, Director of Technology and Subsystems, dated December 21, 1966. The witness reported observing a single object for approximately 15 minutes. The object was described as having a rounded bottom and top with a projection, featuring three or four lighted blocks and red lights around a white body. The witness noted that the object moved slowly, at a speed described as less than a walking speed, and traveled in an easterly direction. The witness, who indicated an interest in aircraft, stated that the object did not resemble any known aircraft. The observation was made from inside a building in a residential section of the city. The Air Force concluded that the information provided was insufficient for a formal evaluation, which necessitated the issuance of the FTD Form 164 questionnaire to the witness for further details. The document includes the witness's sketches and descriptions of the object's appearance and motion.

The information in his report was not sufficient for evaluation.

Official Assessment

INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR EVALUATION

The initial report provided to the Duty Officer at Wright-Patterson AFB was deemed insufficient for evaluation, leading to the request for the witness to complete a formal questionnaire.

Witnesses

Key Persons