Declassified UFO / UAP Document

Project 10073 Record: Sighting Report - Condon, AFS, Oregon, 30 July 1966

📅 30 July 1966 📍 Condon, AFS, Oregon 🏛 26 Air Division 📄 Sighting report and correspondence

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

A military witness reported a star-shaped object following his car in Oregon in 1966. The Air Force concluded the description was consistent with a satellite, though the case was not considered profitable for further evaluation.

This document contains a U.S. Air Force sighting report regarding an Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon observed on July 30, 1966, near Condon, Oregon. The witness, A1C Joel C. Shiver, a switchboard operator with the 636th RADRON, reported observing a white, star-shaped object while driving. The object appeared to follow his vehicle for approximately 12 to 20 minutes before accelerating toward the northeast. The witness described the object as a bright light, similar to a 'large, bright Christmas star.' The report includes a completed U.S. Air Force Technical Information questionnaire, where the witness provided details about the sighting, including his location, the duration, and the lack of sound. The witness noted that the object did not appear to be very high, but he could not estimate its distance. The official Air Force evaluation, prepared by the 26 Air Division, noted discrepancies in the reported time and duration of the sighting. The conclusion suggested that, with the exception of the time duration, the description was consistent with that of a satellite. A handwritten note on the record indicates that further evaluation was not considered profitable. The document also includes correspondence from the Foreign Technology Division (FTD) requesting that the witness complete the formal questionnaire, as initial information was insufficient for a full evaluation.

Follow up would be [illegible]. To evaluate - does not seem profitable to do so.

Official Assessment

Description with the exception of time duration is consistent with that of a satellite.

The report notes discrepancies in the time of sighting and duration. The intelligence staff of the 26 Air Division offered no preliminary analysis as to the cause of the sighting.

Witnesses

Key Persons

Military Units