Declassified UFO / UAP Document

Project 10073 Records — Indianapolis, Indiana, May 1966

📅 4 May 1966 and 18 May 1966 📍 Indianapolis, Indiana 🏛 Project Blue Book 📄 sighting_report

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

This document compiles two 1966 UFO sighting reports from Indianapolis that were closed as 'insufficient data' because the witnesses failed to return follow-up questionnaires.

This document contains records from Project 10073, specifically regarding two separate unidentified aerial phenomena sightings reported in Indianapolis, Indiana, in May 1966. The first incident occurred on 4 May 1966, involving a single witness who reported a football-shaped, orange object traveling southwest. The witness described the object as having a low rumbling sound, flickering, and changing brightness before disappearing behind trees. The second incident occurred on 18 May 1966, near Weir Cook Airport, involving a witness who described an object resembling a blimp that moved in a zig-zag pattern and was observed for approximately 30 minutes. In both instances, the U.S. Air Force, through the Project Blue Book office at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, sent FTD Form 164 to the witnesses to gather more detailed information. However, the records indicate that in both cases, the forms were not returned within the 30-day window. Consequently, Major Hector Quintanilla, Jr., Chief of Project Blue Book, concluded that there was insufficient data for a formal evaluation of either sighting. The file includes correspondence from the Air Force to the witnesses, internal memo routing slips from duty officers noting difficulties in reaching witnesses, and the technical information questionnaires completed by the witnesses.

The information which we have received is not sufficient for evaluation.

Official Assessment

Insufficient data for evaluation.

In both cases, the witnesses failed to return the requested FTD Form 164 within 30 days, leading to the conclusion of insufficient data.

Witnesses

Key Persons

Military Units