Declassified UFO / UAP Document
Incident Report: Radar Sighting at Truax Field, Wisconsin, 26 July 1965
AI-Generated Summary
A radar sighting of an unidentified object at 100,000 feet and 1,000 knots was reported on July 26, 1965. The Foreign Technology Division concluded the most logical explanation was a high-performance, possibly experimental, aircraft.
This document consists of a series of communications regarding a radar sighting that occurred on July 26, 1965, near Truax Field, Wisconsin. The initial report, transmitted via the Air Force Staff Message Branch, describes a single unidentified object detected by ground radar at 0230Z. The object was tracked at an altitude of 100,000 feet, moving at a speed exceeding 1,000 knots on a southwest flight path. The observation lasted for ten minutes before radar contact was lost. The observer was identified as an Army Air Defense Missile Site (ARADCOM Site C-72), located 14 miles west of O'Hara Air Force Base. Weather conditions were reported as clear with no unusual activity. Following the report, Major H. Quintanilla, Jr. of the Aerial Phenomena Branch requested a formal analysis from the Foreign Technology Division. In an indorsement dated August 10, 1965, Lt. Colonel John W. Vega of the Electronics Directorate concluded that the evidence provided was too meager for a definitive evaluation. However, through a process of elimination, he determined that the target was too slow to be a meteor, and that its speed and altitude were consistent with a high-performance, potentially experimental, aircraft. He noted that there was no evidence of radar malfunction or false targets, leading to the conclusion that a high-performance aircraft was the most logical explanation.
There being no reason to consider the targets as false, or the radar as malfunctioning, the high performance aircraft remains the most logical explanation.
PDF not loading? Download the PDF directly
Official Assessment
The high performance aircraft remains the most logical explanation.
The evidence was considered too meager for a firm evaluation, but by process of elimination, the target was too slow for a meteor and its speed and altitude were compatible with a high-performance (possibly experimental) aircraft.
Key Persons
- H. Quintanilla, JrMajor, USAF, Chief, Aerial Phenomena Branch
- BryantMr., TDEED
- John W. VegaLt. Colonel, USAF, Actg Director Electronics Directorate