Declassified UFO / UAP Document

Sighting Report and Correspondence — Seward, Pennsylvania, January 1965

📅 30 January 65 📍 Seward, Pennsylvania 🏛 Aerial Phenomena Branch 📄 sighting_report_and_correspondence

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

A civilian in Seward, Pennsylvania, reported a two-second aerial sighting on January 30, 1965. The Air Force investigated the report and concluded the object was a meteor, distinguishing it from satellite decay.

This document contains a sighting report and subsequent correspondence regarding an unidentified aerial object observed in Seward, Pennsylvania, on January 30, 1965. A civilian witness reported observing an object at 9:23 P.M. that appeared as a large silver glow, moving west for approximately two seconds. The witness described the object as looking like a shooting star, but noted the absence of a tail and compared the visual effect to a carbon arc light. The official conclusion reached by the Aerial Phenomena Branch at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base was that the object was a meteor. The report explicitly states that the duration and direction of the object's entry were inconsistent with satellite decay. In a follow-up letter dated February 4, 1965, Major Hector Quintanilla, Jr., Chief of the Aerial Phenomena Branch, addressed the witness, explaining that satellite decays are distinguished from meteor sightings by their specific flight paths and longer durations. He noted that a satellite re-entry over Pennsylvania would typically hold an easterly component and last longer than the two-second observation reported by the witness.

Looked like a shooting star except that there was no tail. Carbon arc light effect.

Official Assessment

Astronomical (METEOR). Duration and direction of entry wrong for Satellite Decay. Probable meteor sighting.

The object was determined to be a meteor rather than a satellite decay due to the duration and direction of the object's entry into the atmosphere.

Witnesses

Key Persons

Military Units