Declassified UFO / UAP Document

Project 10073 Record Card — Vicinity Juneau, Alaska, 24 April 1961

📅 24 April 1961 📍 Vicinity Juneau, Alaska 🏛 ATIC 📄 Sighting report and teletype message

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

A civilian in Juneau, Alaska, reported a fireball-like object on 24 April 1961. Military investigation concluded the object was likely a meteor, noting a lack of corroborating air traffic or physical evidence.

This document comprises a Project 10073 record card and associated teletype correspondence regarding an Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) sighting reported in Juneau, Alaska, on 24 April 1961. The report was prepared by MSGT Edward L. Richmond, Acting Station Commander of the US Army Alaska Communication System. A 34-year-old female civilian witness reported observing a round, white ball of fire with a red triangular tail, approximately half the size of the main body, moving in a straight northerly direction at a constant speed. The observation lasted approximately 15 seconds. The witness, who was located one-quarter mile north of the Juneau Douglas Bridge on North Douglas Road, reported that the object appeared to be the size of a baseball held at arm's length. No sound was heard, and no maneuvers were noted before the object faded from sight. The witness contacted the FAA flight plans office at Juneau Airport prior to 2300 hours on the date of the incident to inquire if others had reported the object, and was informed that someone else had reported seeing what could have been a meteor. Official investigation by the military confirmed that there was no air traffic in the vicinity at the time, and the FAA had no entries in their logs to substantiate the report. The official conclusion reached by the evaluating agency, ATIC, was that the object was a meteor. MSGT Richmond noted in his report that the preliminary investigation was not sufficiently conclusive to base a definitive analysis and that any physical evidence to support the report was doubtful and unknown.

Any existence of physical evidence to substantiate this UFO is doubtful and unknown.

Official Assessment

Was Astronomical Meteor

The object was identified as a slow-moving meteor. Investigation with FAA officials revealed no air traffic in the vicinity at the time of the sighting.

Witnesses

Key Persons