Declassified UFO / UAP Document
Project 10073 Record Card and Incident Report — Gulkana, Alaska, 25 March 1961
AI-Generated Summary
A single witness in Gulkana, Alaska, reported a rectangular, baseball-sized object on March 25, 1961. The military investigation concluded the report was insufficient for evaluation, suggesting a meteor or satellite as potential explanations.
This document consists of a Project 10073 Record Card and a supporting military intelligence teletype regarding a UFO sighting reported on March 25, 1961, near Gulkana, Alaska. The witness, identified as a 49-year-old FAA Station Manager, reported observing a single object at approximately 2200 local time. The object was described as rectangular in shape, tapering to a point, and roughly the size of a baseball. Its appearance was noted as bright white, transitioning to a yellow taper. The witness observed the object for approximately 10 seconds as it appeared and disappeared while moving along a straight flight path from south to north. The weather was reported as clear. The official evaluation of the sighting, conducted by the Alaskan Air Command and reviewed by ATIC, concluded that the data was insufficient for a definitive identification. The investigating officer, Captain William T. Wilson, suggested that the object might have been a meteor, noting that cold air conditions could have caused the object to appear to move slower than it actually did. Captain Wilson also noted that while the FAA logs showed no aircraft activity, low-flying aircraft remained a potential explanation, and he further speculated on the possibility of a satellite. The report concludes by referencing hearsay from the witness regarding similar objects observed in the area over the preceding weeks.
It is possible that objt was a meteor, and cold air made it appear to move slower than it actually was.
PDF not loading? Download the PDF directly
Official Assessment
Witness stated that objt was coasting, not moving fast. It is possible that objt was a meteor, and cold air made it appear to move slower than it actually was. However, due to there being only 1 witness, this report is evaluated as Insufficient Data.
The sighting was evaluated as insufficient data due to the single witness. The investigator suggested a meteor as a possible explanation, noting that cold air might have affected the perceived speed.
Witnesses
- [illegible]Station Manager (Flt Ser Specialist)FAA, Glenn Allen, Alaska
Key Persons
- William T. WilsonIntel Off., AAC