Declassified UFO / UAP Document

Analysis of Unknown Material Sample, July 1946

🏛 Multiple Swedish technical institutions 📄 field_report

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

This report documents the failed attempts by Swedish experts to identify an unknown material sample in July 1946. Despite testing against various resins and industrial products, the material's origin remained undetermined.

This document details the technical analysis of an unidentified material sample conducted between July 13 and July 15, 1946. The investigation involved consultations with experts at the Geological Survey of Sweden (Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning), the Royal Institute of Technology (Tekniska Högskolan), and the company AB Wilh. Becker. The sample was initially hypothesized to be an industrial waste product altered by atmospheric conditions. Dr. Thorslund of the Geological Survey dismissed the possibility that the sample was a fossil or recent resin, suggesting it might be cellulose industry waste. Docent E. Öman, an expert in paper technology at the Royal Institute of Technology, examined the sample and found no evidence of cellulose industry waste. He noted a potential similarity to a nitration product of retene. Subsequent testing with concentrated nitric acid, however, failed to dissolve the sample, which instead turned black. Docent Öman also considered the possibility of discarded linseed oil but could not explain the material's unique structure. Finally, discussions with Engineer Klang at AB Wilh. Becker on July 15, 1946, involved comparing the sample against known resins, including copal, dammar, and akaroid resins. It was concluded that the sample did not match any known resins or technical products, leaving its origin unidentified.

Ingenjör Klang hade icke någon uppfattning om, huruvida produkten överhuvudtaget kunde härröra från någon känd teknisk produkt.

Official Assessment

Experts from the Geological Survey of Sweden, the Royal Institute of Technology, and AB Wilh. Becker were unable to identify the material. It was determined not to be a fossil or recent resin, nor a known technical product like copal, dammar, or akaroid resin. Nitric acid testing failed to dissolve the material.

Key Persons

  • ThorslundStatsgeolog at Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning
  • E. ÖmanDocent, speciallärare i pappersteknik och sakkunnig på cellulosaområdet
  • KlangIngenjör at AB Wilh. Becker