Declassified UFO / UAP Document

Project 10073 Record Cards and Reports — Neffesville, Pennsylvania and Dhahran, Saudi Arabia

📅 20 August 1952 (Neffesville); 20 August 1952 (Dhahran) 📍 Neffesville, Pennsylvania; Dhahran Airfield, Saudi Arabia 🏛 Air Technical Intelligence Center (ATIC) 📄 Sighting report and worksheet

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

This document compiles two 1952 UAP sighting reports from Pennsylvania and Saudi Arabia. Both reports were evaluated by ATIC and ultimately classified as having insufficient data.

This document contains a collection of Project 10073 record cards, worksheets, and teletype reports concerning two separate Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) sightings occurring on August 20, 1952. The first incident took place in Neffesville, Pennsylvania, where a witness named Mr. Ford and two others observed a strange object at an altitude of approximately 500 feet. The witnesses initially mistook the object for an airplane. The report from Flight Operations at Olmsted AFB describes the weather as clear with calm winds. The second incident occurred at Dhahran Airfield in Saudi Arabia, where a clear white light, described as the size of a pin point, was observed through a theodolite. The object was tracked for four consecutive minutes before being lost. The report from the Air Weather Service Detachment at Dhahran notes that there was no physical evidence, no radar contact, and no known air traffic in the area at the time of the sighting. Both reports were forwarded to the Air Technical Intelligence Center (ATIC) at Wright-Patterson AFB for evaluation. The final evaluation for the reports was 'insufficient data', with a handwritten note on the Neffesville worksheet stating the report was 'too scanty'.

Report too scanty.

Official Assessment

Report too scanty.

The reports from both Neffesville and Dhahran were deemed insufficient for evaluation, with the Neffesville report specifically noted as 'too scanty'.

Witnesses