Declassified UFO / UAP Document
Incident Report and Photo Analysis — Lexington, Missouri, March 12, 1967
AI-Generated Summary
A 15-year-old witness reported a UFO sighting in Lexington, Missouri, in 1967. Air Force photographic analysis determined the images were likely faked or misinterpreted due to camera movement, concluding the object was much smaller than claimed.
This document details a UFO sighting report from Lexington, Missouri, occurring on March 12, 1967. A 15-year-old witness reported observing a dull grey, elliptical object for approximately three minutes. The witness claimed the object was 15 to 20 feet in diameter, made no noise, had no lights, and moved slowly before dropping down and flying east. The witness provided three negatives and two prints of the object to the Air Force. The Foreign Technology Division (FTD) conducted a photographic analysis of the materials. Their findings, documented in a Photo Analysis Report (67-50), concluded that the photographs showed vertical panning or 'smearing' of the foreground house, indicating the object was much closer to the camera than the witness claimed, and thus significantly smaller than the reported 15-20 feet. The investigators ultimately concluded that the photography did not substantiate the witness's claims regarding the object's size and that they were unable to positively identify the object beyond it being a dark elliptical mass. Furthermore, the report notes that the photography is not considered genuine. The file includes correspondence between the witness and the Air Force, with the Air Force requesting technical details about the camera used (a Japanese-made camera using 120 film) and the witness requesting prints of the negatives. The case record also contains a note suggesting a polygraph was needed.
Based on the foregoing observations, it would appear that the photography is not genuine insofar as reported content is concerned.
PDF not loading? Download the PDF directly
Official Assessment
The photography does not substantiate the statement regarding the relative size of the object. Without specific details we are unable to positively identify the object, other than it being a dark elliptical mass.
Photographic analysis revealed vertical panning (smearing) of the house in the foreground, suggesting the object was between the house and the observer, and therefore much smaller than the 15-20 feet claimed by the witness. The photography is not considered genuine.
Witnesses
Key Persons
- Major QuintanillaRequested analysis
- Wilber Price, Jr.Chief, Photo Exploitation Division