Declassified UFO / UAP Document

Correspondence between H. Marshall Chadwell and Dr. H. P. Robertson regarding Panel report

🏛 OSI 📄 correspondence

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

This document contains correspondence between H. Marshall Chadwell and Dr. H. P. Robertson regarding the finalization and scheduling of a Panel report in January 1953. It highlights administrative coordination between government officials and academic researchers during this period.

This document consists of two pieces of correspondence between H. Marshall Chadwell and Dr. H. P. Robertson, dated January 1953. The first letter, written by Chadwell on January 28, 1953, acknowledges receipt of a letter from Robertson and confirms that a copy of a 'Panel report' is being processed with concurrence and recommendations. Chadwell notes that a 'rump Panel meeting' is not expected the following week, but he hopes to meet with Robertson on February 6, 1953, to discuss official action. He also mentions that a memo from 'Fred' has been delayed. The second document is a letter from Robertson to Chadwell, dated January 20, 1953. In this letter, Robertson discusses the composition of the panel, noting that members were not handpicked by him, with the exception of Thornton. He mentions a meeting with General Sanford at the 'P-gon' (Pentagon). Robertson requests that a draft be sent to him at the Norman Bridge Laboratory of Physics at the California Institute of Technology. He also outlines a schedule for an NSA group meeting on February 5, 1953, and suggests that a meeting with the 'rump Panel' could occur on February 6 or 7, 1953, to accommodate Sam Goudsmit and others. The letter concludes with a personal note to Mary and Peggy regarding a social gathering.

The report is on its way up the ladder with our concurrence and conclusions and recommendations.

Key Persons