Declassified UFO / UAP Document

Freedom of Information Act Case DON-NAVY-2020-006828

🏛 Naval Air Warfare Center - Aircraft Division 📄 FOIA response letter and internal email correspondence

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

This document contains a FOIA response from the Navy regarding the classification review of three cockpit videos. It includes internal emails confirming that the 'FLIR 1' and 'GoFast' videos were determined to be unclassified by Radar and EO/IR leads.

This document is a formal response from the Department of the Navy, Naval Air Systems Command, to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request submitted by John Greenwald, Jr. on April 17, 2020. The request sought records, including communications and internal notes, regarding AFOSI investigation case #3290517356125, which involved the analysis of three videos by the Naval Air Warfare Center - Aircraft Division. The Navy provided the requested records, though some portions were withheld under FOIA Exemptions (b)(5) and (b)(6), citing the protection of internal advice, recommendations, and personal privacy. The document includes a series of internal email exchanges from March 2018, which detail the process of reviewing cockpit videos for classification. These emails show that personnel were coordinating with the DITMAC Office and the EO/IR IPT leads to determine the classification status of videos referred to as 'FLIR 1' and 'GoFast'. The consensus reached by the Radar and EO/IR leads was that the videos were unclassified, as they contained no sensitive symbology or other items of concern. The correspondence also highlights the administrative procedures for handling these files on secure networks (SIPRNET) and the request for further reviews of additional public domain videos. The document concludes with instructions for the requester on how to appeal the decision if desired.

"There was analysis on three videos which they determined there was 'no sensitive symbology or other items of concern.'"

Official Assessment

Videos determined to have no sensitive symbology or other items of concern.

The Navy determined that the videos in question, specifically 'FLIR 1' and 'GoFast', were unclassified from an EO/IR perspective.

Key Persons