Declassified UFO / UAP Document

A Perfect Mole? / Wormholes and Faster-Than-Light Travel: Latest News

📄 Article compilation

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

The document reports on allegations of a Ministry of Defence mole within the Flying Saucer Review and summarizes contemporary scientific news regarding faster-than-light travel experiments.

This document contains two distinct articles. The first, 'A Perfect Mole?' by John Squareman, discusses allegations made by Paul Fuller in a letter to Colin Andrews dated February 9, 1988. Fuller claimed that Gordon Creighton, the editor of Flying Saucer Review (FSR), was a Ministry of Defence mole tasked with discrediting UFO research. The article notes that this is part of a broader controversy involving J. Randles and the 'A.P.E.N.' affair from the 1970s. The editor of the publication adds a note stating that no one at FSR has ever seen any documentation regarding 'A.P.E.N.' and characterizes the story as a scurrilous fabrication. The second article, 'Wormholes and Faster-Than-Light Travel: Latest News' by Paul Whitehead, reports on scientific claims regarding faster-than-light travel. It references articles in 'Electronics & Wireless World' and 'The Times' from November 1988, which discuss experiments involving a 'special electronic circuit' and observations of galaxies by the Max Planck Institute. Dr. Harold Aspden is cited as having scrutinized the methods, and American instrument maker Alexis Obolensky is mentioned as believing the effect could be reproduced in a laboratory.

The methods used in the experiments have been scrutinised by a British Scientist, Dr Harold Aspden, who stated:- 'There is no obvious flaw in the equipment; the experiments were well conducted, and the findings seem to be correct.'

Key Persons