Declassified UFO / UAP Document

Comments on 00-B-90229, Sighting of Unconventional Aircraft

🏛 Scientific Advisory Board to the Chief of Staff, USAF 📄 Memorandum

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

This memorandum assesses a sighting of an unconventional aircraft, concluding that the object was likely a missile or rail-launched aircraft rather than a 'flying saucer'. It references 1954 USAF Scientific Advisory Board research into vertical thrust technologies.

This memorandum, addressed to the Director of Central Intelligence from the Assistant Director of Scientific Intelligence, Herbert Scoville, Jr., provides an assessment regarding a sighting of an unconventional aircraft, referenced as 00-B-90229. The document notes that the lighting and distance conditions during the sighting made identification difficult. However, the author observes that the object's behavior—specifically its spiraling motion upon leaving the launcher—is inconsistent with a vertical take-off aircraft. Instead, the characteristics described are more indicative of a missile or aircraft launched from a zero-length rail, a process that would typically involve visible flame and smoke. The memorandum further references a 1954 evaluation by the Scientific Advisory Board to the Chief of Staff, USAF, which had been tasked with investigating the 'flying saucer' phenomenon. The Board had previously concluded that various factors, such as payload and drag, were often overlooked in such reports. The current Air Force research, as noted in the document, is focused on vertical thrust technologies that modify the traditional 'flying saucer' concept. Ultimately, the document concludes that while the specific object cannot be identified, the evidence suggests it was not a 'flying saucer'.

The very small amount of details given in the referenced report does not permit an identification of the object sighted. It does, however, tend to indicate that it was not a "flying saucer".

Official Assessment

The report does not permit an identification of the object sighted. It does, however, tend to indicate that it was not a 'flying saucer'.

The object's behavior, specifically the spiraling motion upon leaving the launcher, does not fit well with a vertical take-off aircraft. The description is consistent with a missile or aircraft launched from a zero-length rail, which would typically produce significant flame and smoke.

Key Persons

Military Units