Declassified UFO / UAP Document
Comments on 00-B-90229, Sighting of Unconventional Aircraft
AI-Generated Summary
This memorandum assesses a sighting of an unconventional aircraft, concluding that the object was likely a missile or rail-launched aircraft rather than a 'flying saucer'. It references 1954 USAF Scientific Advisory Board research into vertical thrust technologies.
This memorandum, addressed to the Director of Central Intelligence from the Assistant Director of Scientific Intelligence, Herbert Scoville, Jr., provides an assessment regarding a sighting of an unconventional aircraft, referenced as 00-B-90229. The document notes that the lighting and distance conditions during the sighting made identification difficult. However, the author observes that the object's behavior—specifically its spiraling motion upon leaving the launcher—is inconsistent with a vertical take-off aircraft. Instead, the characteristics described are more indicative of a missile or aircraft launched from a zero-length rail, a process that would typically involve visible flame and smoke. The memorandum further references a 1954 evaluation by the Scientific Advisory Board to the Chief of Staff, USAF, which had been tasked with investigating the 'flying saucer' phenomenon. The Board had previously concluded that various factors, such as payload and drag, were often overlooked in such reports. The current Air Force research, as noted in the document, is focused on vertical thrust technologies that modify the traditional 'flying saucer' concept. Ultimately, the document concludes that while the specific object cannot be identified, the evidence suggests it was not a 'flying saucer'.
The very small amount of details given in the referenced report does not permit an identification of the object sighted. It does, however, tend to indicate that it was not a "flying saucer".
PDF not loading? Download the PDF directly
Official Assessment
The report does not permit an identification of the object sighted. It does, however, tend to indicate that it was not a 'flying saucer'.
The object's behavior, specifically the spiraling motion upon leaving the launcher, does not fit well with a vertical take-off aircraft. The description is consistent with a missile or aircraft launched from a zero-length rail, which would typically produce significant flame and smoke.
Key Persons
- Herbert Scoville, Jr.Assistant Director, Scientific Intelligence