Declassified UFO / UAP Document

NIDS and the "Day After" scenarios

🏛 NIDS 📄 blog post

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

This document summarizes NIDS research into 'Day After' scenarios, which modeled societal and religious reactions to a potential official announcement of extraterrestrial contact. It highlights internal NIDS surveys and the persistent interest of Bob Bigelow in contingency planning for such an event.

This document, authored by Keith Basterfield on December 29, 2019, provides a historical overview of the 'Day After' scenarios explored by the National Institute for Discovery Science (NIDS) between 1995 and 2004. The core subject is the investigation into how society, government, and religious institutions would react to an official announcement confirming the existence of extraterrestrial life. The author draws heavily from the diaries of Jacques Vallee, a member of the NIDS Science Advisory Board, to illustrate the internal discussions held by NIDS founder Bob Bigelow and others regarding the potential for a 'dramatic development' or 'striking announcement' by the government. The document details several specific research initiatives, most notably a 1999 nationwide survey conducted by the Roper organization for NIDS, which sought to gauge public opinion on extraterrestrial contact. This survey was compared against an online questionnaire distributed to NIDS website visitors. The results indicated a widespread lack of trust in the U.S. government's willingness to disclose information, with a majority of respondents believing the government would classify or suppress such evidence. Furthermore, the document references the 'Alexander UFO Religious Crisis Survey' and subsequent academic work by Ted Peters and Julie Froehlig, which investigated the potential impact of contact on organized religion. The author concludes by noting that while these 'Day After' scenarios were a significant area of interest for NIDS, they were not a primary focus for the author until this research compilation. The document serves as a synthesis of NIDS's efforts to model the social and consciousness-related impacts of a potential disclosure event.

Bob Bigelow is still fascinated with "Day After" scenarios. Standing before the full board...he went over the history of our efforts from the initial appeal to the military to the more recent idea of having our own contingency plan if it turned out, as he put it, that "we were cohabiting on the Earth with non human entities that controlled our destiny."

Official Assessment

The document examines the concept of 'Day After' scenarios—the study of societal, institutional, and religious reactions to a potential official announcement of extraterrestrial contact. It details NIDS's internal interest in these scenarios, including funding for surveys conducted by the Roper organization and research by Albert A. Harrison and Victoria Alexander. The findings suggest that while the general public expresses significant distrust in government transparency regarding UFOs, NIDS-affiliated respondents displayed higher levels of confidence or complacency. The document also highlights the historical interest of Bob Bigelow in these contingency plans, driven by his belief that a dramatic development regarding non-human entities was imminent.

Key Persons