Declassified UFO / UAP Document

BUFORA Bulletin No. 12, February 1984

🏛 BUFORA 📄 Bulletin

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

This BUFORA Bulletin from February 1984 provides an overview of the association's research into the Rendlesham Forest incident, UFO sightings in Norway, and internal organizational updates. It highlights the ongoing debate between ufologists and skeptics regarding the nature of UAP.

This document is the February 1984 issue (No. 012) of the British UFO Research Association (BUFORA) Bulletin. It serves as a comprehensive record of the association's activities, internal governance, and research findings. The bulletin includes reports on the Rendlesham Forest incident, featuring analysis of Colonel Charles Holt's statement and the investigative work of Jenny Randles, Dot Street, and Brenda Butler. It also covers UFO sightings in Norway, specifically in Arendal and the Hessdalen Valley, detailing the efforts of UFO Norway to document these phenomena. The publication contains articles on the intersection of ufology and parapsychology, including a piece by Manfred Cassirer on telepathic communication with extraterrestrials. Internal organizational updates are provided, such as the resignation of the treasurer, Hans Streuli, and the election of new council members. The bulletin also features book reviews, including works by Hilary Evans and Magnus Pyke, and a 'UFO News Round-Up' summarizing international reports. The document highlights the association's commitment to unbiased scientific research while acknowledging the challenges of investigating controversial cases and the skepticism faced by the ufology community. It concludes with information on upcoming meetings and a call for members to participate in research and administrative tasks.

That an intelligent, high-ranking air force officer, not to mention scores of qualified airmen, could, individually and collectively, mistake the lights from Orford Ness for a landing object (whatever its nature) is ludicrous as a solution and must be dismissed.

Key Persons