Declassified UFO / UAP Document

Project 10073 Record — Sighting near Fairborn, Ohio, 9 October 1968

📅 9 Oct 68 📍 Near Fairborn, Ohio 🏛 Aerial Phenomena Office 📄 Sighting report and correspondence

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

A 14-year-old reported a UFO sighting near Fairborn, Ohio, on October 9, 1968. The Air Force investigation was terminated due to the witness providing an invalid address, rendering the case insufficient for evaluation.

This document contains the records for a UFO sighting reported on October 9, 1968, near Fairborn, Ohio. The witness, a 14-year-old civilian, reported observing a single object for approximately 10 minutes. The witness described the object as having a round shape with a yellow glow and a blue light at the bottom, noting that it 'looked like a flat saucer.' The witness claimed to have been looking at the moon through a telescope when the object appeared. The object reportedly flew off and disappeared into the clouds. The witness also noted a smell of sulfur. The Air Force, specifically the Aerial Phenomena Office of the Foreign Technology Division, attempted to follow up on the report by sending an AF Form 117 to the address provided by the witness. However, the correspondence was returned to the sender marked 'No such address' and 'Insufficient address.' Consequently, the official conclusion for Project 10073 was that there was insufficient data for evaluation.

INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR EVALUATION

Official Assessment

INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR EVALUATION. Form 117 returned because there is no such address that the observer gave the Duty Officer.

The investigation could not proceed because the observer provided an invalid address, resulting in the return of the required AF Form 117.

Witnesses

Key Persons