Declassified UFO / UAP Document

Project 10073 Record — UFO Observation, 6 February 1968

📅 6 February 1968 📍 Toledo, Ohio 🏛 Aerial Phenomena Office (Project Blue Book) 📄 Correspondence and Project Record

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

A 1968 UFO sighting in Toledo, Ohio, was closed by Project Blue Book due to insufficient data after the witness failed to return a formal reporting form.

This document file contains records regarding a UFO sighting reported in Toledo, Ohio, on February 6, 1968. The witness submitted a letter to the Project Blue Book office describing two white objects observed between 6:45 and 7:00 PM. The witness characterized the movement of these objects as being slower than a meteor but faster than a plane, and noted that they were as fast as a satellite. The witness also observed two planes in the area and described the weather as very clear but becoming cloudy. The Aerial Phenomena Office, under Major Hector Quintanilla, Jr., responded to the witness on April 4, 1968, requesting that they complete an official AF Form 117 to provide a formal statement for evaluation. The final project record indicates that the case was closed with the conclusion of 'INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR EVALUATION' because the witness failed to return the requested AF Form 117 within the 30-day window.

Two white objects observed moving slower than a meteor, but faster than a plane.

Official Assessment

INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR EVALUATION. Witness did not return AF Form 117 within 30 days.

The witness reported two white objects moving at speeds between that of a meteor and a plane. Due to the sketchy nature of the initial letter and the failure of the witness to return the formal AF Form 117, the case was closed as having insufficient data.

Witnesses