Declassified UFO / UAP Document
Project 10073 Record: UFO Sighting, Bellevue, Ohio, 7 December 1967
AI-Generated Summary
A 1967 UFO sighting in Bellevue, Ohio, was investigated by Project Blue Book and officially classified as 'Possible (AIRCRAFT).' The investigation was marked by significant internal disagreement between Air Force personnel, who doubted the witness's credibility, and Dr. J. Allen Hynek, who argued the aircraft explanation was untenable based on the reported flight characteristics.
This document collection details the investigation of a UFO sighting reported by Robert A. Overhelt in Bellevue, Ohio, on December 7, 1967. The witness, a student, reported observing a saucer-shaped craft with a white light on the bottom and red revolving lights on the side. He claimed to have been in a car with friends when they attempted to follow the object, which he estimated to be 50 to 75 feet in diameter. The report includes multiple iterations of correspondence between the Air Force's Aerial Phenomena Office (Project Blue Book) and the witness, as well as internal assessments by Air Force personnel and Dr. J. Allen Hynek of Northwestern University.
Internal Air Force assessments, specifically a draft by Lt. Marano, highlight significant inconsistencies in the witness's testimony. These include conflicting statements regarding the distance of the object (ranging from 300 feet to eight miles) and the number of witnesses present. The Air Force ultimately classified the event as 'Possible (AIRCRAFT),' concluding that the object's flight characteristics were not impossible for an aircraft and that the witness's account was unreliable, noting that the witness had access to a 'green 164 reporting form' previously published in a magazine.
Dr. J. Allen Hynek, acting as a consultant, challenged the Air Force's conclusion. In a letter dated July 9, 1968, Hynek argued that if the composite testimony of the witnesses were taken at face value—specifically that the object stood still, flashed, and flickered—the aircraft explanation was 'untenable.' He suggested that further interrogation was necessary to determine if the object's 'standing still' was a result of radial motion or a genuine hover. Despite Hynek's recommendation for further investigation, the Air Force maintained its assessment that the sighting did not represent a threat to national security or provide information of scientific value.
If we take their composite testimony, then the aircraft explanation is untenable.
PDF not loading? Download the PDF directly
Official Assessment
Possible (AIRCRAFT)
The Air Force concluded the sighting was likely an aircraft, noting that the object's behavior did not include erratic motions impossible for an aircraft and that the witness's testimony was inconsistent.
Witnesses
Key Persons
- J. Allen HynekDirector, Lindheimer Astronomical Research Center
- Lt. MaranoAir Force officer who drafted an internal assessment