Declassified UFO / UAP Document

UFO Observation, 27 Feb 67 - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

📅 27 Feb 67 📍 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 🏛 Foreign Technology Division 📄 Correspondence and Sighting Questionnaire

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

A 1967 UFO sighting in Philadelphia by nursing students was reported to the Air Force's Foreign Technology Division. The Air Force determined the provided information was insufficient for a scientific evaluation.

This document contains a UFO sighting report from February 27, 1967, involving two witnesses at the University of Pennsylvania Hospital School of Nursing in Philadelphia. The witnesses observed a blue-white object with a rotating red light in the eastern sky for approximately one hour. The object's behavior was described as complex: it appeared to fuse from two lights into a single ball of light, stood still, moved vertically, and disappeared and reappeared. The witnesses provided conflicting reports regarding the object's trajectory, stating it moved both from the southwest to the northeast and vice versa. One witness also noted the presence of 'tripod legs' on the object. The report includes a formal letter from Colonel James C. Manatt of the Air Force's Foreign Technology Division (FTD), dated March 2, 1967, informing the witness that the initial information provided was insufficient for a scientific evaluation and requesting the completion of an FTD Form 164. The witness completed the questionnaire, noting her interest in astronomy and her ability to distinguish between aircraft, stars, and anomalous objects. The Air Force concluded that the data was insufficient for a formal evaluation.

I am interested in the stars and watch the sky at night frequently. I feel I can distinguish between an an airplane, a star, and an object such as this

Official Assessment

The information which we have received is not sufficient for a scientific evaluation.

The report contains conflicting data regarding the object's course and movement.

Witnesses

  • [illegible]School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania Hospital

Key Persons

  • ClarkRecipient of initial report