Declassified UFO / UAP Document

Project 10073 Record: UFO Sighting - 14 February 1967

📅 13 February 1967 📍 Davidsonville, Maryland 🏛 TDET/UFO 📄 Field Report / Message

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

A civilian reported an elliptical UFO in Maryland in 1967. Air Force investigators found the report inconsistent and concluded there was insufficient data to evaluate the claim.

This document details a UFO sighting reported by a civilian in Davidsonville, Maryland, on the night of February 13, 1967. The observer, an optical design professional employed by Fairchild Hiller Corporation, claimed to have observed an elliptical, pale white/yellow object with red markings and pylons hovering at an altitude of 2,000 feet for approximately 18 to 20 minutes. The observer initially reported taking a photograph of the object using a Polaroid camera attached to a telescope. However, a follow-up in-person interview conducted by 1st Lt. Willard D. Nielsen on February 15, 1967, uncovered significant inconsistencies in the initial report. The observer admitted that the photograph was not taken through the telescope and that he had failed to use a 35mm camera attached to a 250-power telescope, despite having the object in view for nearly 20 minutes. The observer also refused to allow the investigating officer to examine the negative. The investigator noted that the observer was defensive throughout the interview and had a history of seeking attention for previous sightings. Due to the lack of corroborating evidence and the inconsistencies in the observer's account, the Air Force concluded that there was insufficient data for evaluation. The investigator explicitly stated that he could not determine if an object was actually observed and recommended that no further investigation be conducted, characterizing it as a waste of time.

I am not able to decide whether or not [redacted] actually observed an object. I do feel that any further investigation would be a waste of time.

Official Assessment

Insufficient Data for Evaluation

The observer, an optical design professional, reported an elliptical object. Initial reports were contradictory regarding the use of a telescope for photography. Subsequent investigation revealed the observer had a 35mm camera attached to a telescope but failed to use it during the 18-minute sighting. The investigator expressed doubt regarding the validity of the observation.

Witnesses

Key Persons

Military Units