Declassified UFO / UAP Document

Project 10073 Record — Colorado Springs, Colorado, November 1966

📅 25 Nov 66 📍 Colorado Springs, Colorado 🏛 FTD (Foreign Technology Division) 📄 Photo Analysis Report

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

The Air Force investigated a UFO sighting in Colorado Springs where a witness claimed to photograph a 25-foot object. Photo analysis concluded the object in the pictures was likely a small, man-made item only 1-2 feet in diameter, not the craft described by the witness.

This document contains a series of reports and correspondence regarding an Unidentified Flying Object sighting in Colorado Springs, Colorado, in November 1966. The primary witness, Mr. Plumlee of the Thermaflow Corporation, reported observing a silver-colored object, approximately 25 feet in diameter, maneuvering above the ground for 45 minutes. He claimed to have taken photographs of the object. A second witness, Captain James W. Ellstrom, reported seeing an object the following night. The Air Force conducted a formal photo analysis of seven Polaroid prints submitted by the witness. The analysis, conducted by the Foreign Technology Division (FTD), concluded that the photographs were genuine in the sense that they were not double-exposed or retouched. However, the analysts determined that the object captured in the photos did not match the witness's description of a 20-25 foot craft. Instead, the analysis suggested the object was a small, man-made item, likely between one and two feet in diameter, positioned very close to the camera lens. The report notes that at the distance required for the object to appear as it did in the photos, the camera's flash attachment would not have illuminated it, further casting doubt on the witness's account. The official conclusion of the Air Force was that the photographs did not support the witness's description and that the object, if any, was not successfully photographed. The file includes the original sighting report, the formal photo analysis report (NR 67-16), and correspondence between the 4600th Air Base Wing and the FTD regarding the submission of the photographs and negatives.

The object photographed has the appearance of a "crushed" or "squashed" cylinder and exhibits a fairly high degree of detail and reflectivity as is indicated by the reflection of the flash attachment.

Official Assessment

Photo analysis revealed a probable diameter at between one and two feet. It appears that the object observed, if any, was not photographed. Photo does not support the submitted description of the object.

The photographs were genuine and not double-exposed, but the object in the photos was likely a small, man-made object located close to the camera, not the 20-25 foot object described by the witness.

Witnesses

Key Persons