Declassified UFO / UAP Document

Project 10073 Record — Coursegold, California Sighting

📅 9 Oct 66 📍 Coursegold, California 🏛 93 Bomb Wing Castle AFB 📄 Staff Message / Project 10073 Record

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

A civilian witness in Coursegold, California, reported repeated sightings of pulsating, multi-colored aerial objects between 1960 and 1966. The Air Force classified the case as 'insufficient data' due to a lack of required follow-up information.

This document consists of a Project 10073 record and an associated Air Force staff message regarding a series of UFO sightings near Coursegold, California. The primary witness, a civilian resident, reported observing pulsating, glowing lights that shifted between white, red, and green. These objects were noted to remain stationary on a nearby ridge and were capable of rapid movement in any direction, often exceeding the speed of observed jet aircraft. One witness reported seeing a rectangular object with bright lights at the corners. The sightings, which reportedly began in the fall of 1960, saw a sudden increase in frequency in the three weeks leading up to the report in October 1966. On October 23, 1966, the witness observed three objects simultaneously, which appeared to move in formation. The witness, described by interviewing officers as calm and intelligent, communicated with other neighbors and a school teacher in Oakhurst, California, regarding these events. Despite the detailed descriptions provided by the witness, the Air Force concluded that there was insufficient data for a formal evaluation, noting that required information from Castle AFB had not been received as per AFR 80-17.

OFFICERS WHO INTERVIEWED MRS. [illegible] CAN OFFER NO EXPLANATIONS AS TO WHAT THOSE INDIVIDUALS HAVE BEEN SIGHTING.

Official Assessment

Insufficient data for evaluation

The case is being carried as insufficient data because information required by AFR 80-17 was not received from Castle AFB.

Witnesses

Key Persons

Military Units