Declassified UFO / UAP Document

Project 10073 Record — Sighting in New York, New York, 3 May 1966

📅 3 May 1966 📍 New York, New York 🏛 Project Blue Book 📄 Sighting report and correspondence

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

A student reported a circular, blue-white object in New York on 3 May 1966. The Air Force concluded the data was insufficient for evaluation, suggesting weather-related visual distortion.

This document contains the official Air Force record and correspondence regarding a UFO sighting reported on 3 May 1966 in New York, New York. The witness, a student at New York University, reported observing a single, circular, blue-white object described as resembling a basketball. The observation lasted approximately two to three minutes, with the object moving in a south-southeasterly direction at a speed described as very fast. The report was processed under Project 10073 and Project Blue Book. On 1 July 1966, Major Hector Quintanilla, Jr., Chief of Project Blue Book, wrote to the witness stating that the information provided was insufficient for a formal evaluation and requested that the witness complete an FTD Form 164 to provide further details. The internal military message (AFIN 24647) noted that the sighting occurred on a rainy night, which the Air Force suggested could have caused visual distortions of natural phenomena such as airplanes or city lights. Ultimately, the official conclusion reached by the Air Force was that the cause of the sighting was unattainable due to the meager facts available.

In view of the meager facts, conclusion as to cause of sighting is unattainable: however, the rainy night could have distorted a natural phenomena (airplane, city lights, etc).

Official Assessment

In view of the meager facts, conclusion as to cause of sighting is unattainable: however, the rainy night could have distorted a natural phenomena (airplane, city lights, etc).

The sighting was deemed insufficient for evaluation due to a lack of data, with the suggestion that weather conditions may have caused visual distortion.

Witnesses

Key Persons

Military Units