Declassified UFO / UAP Document

UFO Sighting, 3 April 1966, Madison, Wisconsin

📅 3 April 1966 📍 Madison, Wisconsin 🏛 Foreign Technology Division, AFSC 📄 sighting_report

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

A 1966 UFO sighting in Madison, Wisconsin, involving student witnesses and photographic evidence, was investigated by the Air Force. The FTD concluded the photos were the result of camera movement while photographing a stationary light source.

This document collection details a UFO sighting reported on April 3, 1966, in Madison, Wisconsin, by students at the University of Wisconsin. The initial reports, submitted via military message channels, described a cigar-shaped object and later, multiple round, red objects moving westward. The witnesses, students at the university, provided photographic evidence in the form of 35mm color slides. The Foreign Technology Division (FTD) conducted a formal photo analysis of these materials. The final report, dated November 17, 1966, concluded that the images were not of an unidentified flying object, but rather the result of camera movement while attempting to photograph a stationary electric light source at night. The report notes that the resulting 'boomerang' shape in the photos was a byproduct of this movement. The file includes correspondence between the 20th Air Division and the FTD regarding the collection and analysis of the original negatives and slides. The investigating officer, 1st Lt. Frank L. Howe, expressed frustration regarding the lack of detailed data provided by the witnesses, noting in one instance that the investigating officer should have obtained more data. The case was ultimately closed with the conclusion that the phenomenon was likely an electric light, and the photographic evidence was deemed insufficient to support the claim of an unidentified aerial object.

A possible explanation is that subject image was stationary with camera movement causing the curved shape of the resultant imagery; the image being that of an electric light used in a fruitless attempt at some night photography of insufficiently illuminated subjects.

Official Assessment

A possible explanation is that subject image was stationary with camera movement causing the curved shape of the resultant imagery; the image being that of an electric light used in a fruitless attempt at some night photography of insufficiently illuminated subjects.

The photographic analysis concluded the images were likely the result of camera movement while capturing a stationary electric light source.

Witnesses

Key Persons