Declassified UFO / UAP Document
Correspondence and Photo Analysis Report regarding Unidentified Flying Object Sighting in Seattle, Washington
AI-Generated Summary
The Air Force investigated a photograph submitted by a Seattle resident in 1966 and concluded the image was caused by a water droplet on the camera lens. The file includes the official photo analysis report and correspondence with the witness.
This document contains a collection of records related to a UFO sighting report in Seattle, Washington, in January 1966. The primary component is a Photo Analysis Report (66-23) dated June 9, 1966, which evaluates a negative and print submitted by a citizen, Jerry Ross. The analysis, conducted by the Photo Analysis and Photo Processing Divisions of the Foreign Technology Division (AFSC), concluded that the image did not depict a defined object. Instead, investigators determined that the most reasonable explanation for the image was refracted light caused by a small water droplet on the camera lens, internal camera reflection, or water condensation on the film. The file includes correspondence between the Air Force and Mr. Ross, who initially submitted the photograph with some skepticism, suggesting it might be a 'flying jelly fish' or a 'bubble gum on camera lens.' The Air Force requested the original negative for analysis and subsequently provided the findings to Mr. Ross. Additionally, the file contains various administrative forms, including an Engineering Support Work Request and a Sighting of Unidentified Phenomena Questionnaire, as well as personal notes and drawings from the witness describing multiple sightings throughout early 1966. These personal notes detail observations of objects near the moon and stars, which the witness attempted to track and document. The official Air Force conclusion remained that the photographic evidence was not indicative of an unidentified flying object.
The image could have been caused by refracted light from a small water droplet on the lens, water condensation on the film, or an internal camera reflection. A water droplet on the lens appears to be the most reasonable explanation of the image.
PDF not loading? Download the PDF directly
Official Assessment
The image on the negative is probably not from an object on the water or between the water and the camera. In fact, the image does not appear to be that of any defined object. The image could have been caused by refracted light from a small water droplet on the lens, water condensation on the film, or an internal camera reflection. A water droplet on the lens appears to be the most reasonable explanation of the image.
The photographic evidence was determined to be a result of lens artifacts, specifically a water droplet, rather than an unidentified flying object.
Witnesses
Key Persons
- Hector Quintanilla, Jr.Major, USAF, Chief, Project Blue Book
- Richard L. ChanceCaptain, USAF, Chief, Photo Analysis Division
- Wilber Price, Jr.Director, Photo Exploitation Directorate