Declassified UFO / UAP Document
Correspondence Regarding UFO Sightings and Project Blue Book Inquiries (1964-1965)
AI-Generated Summary
This collection of correspondence documents the Air Force's administrative response to public UFO inquiries between 1964 and 1965. It details the official stance that UFO reports were attributable to natural phenomena or hoaxes and outlines the procedural requirements for reporting sightings.
This document collection consists of a series of letters exchanged between private citizens and the United States Air Force, specifically the Office of Information and the Foreign Technology Division, between 1964 and 1965. The correspondence centers on public inquiries regarding Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs), the history of Air Force investigative projects, and specific sighting reports. Citizens frequently requested detailed data, photographs, and official statements regarding various incidents, including the Socorro, New Mexico sighting and alleged landings in Brooksville, Florida. The Air Force responses are characterized by a consistent policy of providing standardized information. Officials, such as Major Maston M. Jacks and Lt. Colonel John P. Spaulding, repeatedly informed inquirers that the Air Force did not possess photographs for dissemination, as those submitted for analysis were typically identified as common objects, flaws in negatives, or hoaxes. The documents clarify the lineage of Air Force investigative efforts, noting that while projects like Project Saucer, Project Grudge, and Project Sign existed, the current effort was Project Blue Book. In response to specific claims of mass investigations—such as the assertion that 100 men were sent to investigate sightings in the Binghamton-Endicott area—the Air Force provided detailed rebuttals, explaining that only two officers were dispatched and that the sightings were attributed to natural phenomena. The correspondence also highlights the administrative process for reporting sightings, with the Air Force providing FTD Form 164 to those wishing to submit formal reports. The tone of the Air Force responses is formal and dismissive of the idea that these phenomena represented interplanetary visitors, emphasizing instead that the sightings could be explained by natural causes or identified aircraft.
Those photos which were submitted for analysis have been evaluated as common objects, flaws in the negative, or hoaxes, and all have been returned to the senders.
PDF not loading? Download the PDF directly
Official Assessment
Reports were determined to have been caused by natural phenomena or were considered hoaxes.
The Air Force consistently maintained that UFO reports were either natural phenomena, hoaxes, or lacked sufficient evidence to be considered anything other than common objects.
Key Persons
- Maston M. JacksMajor, USAF, Public Information Division, Office of Information
- John P. SpauldingLt Colonel, USAF, Chief, Civil Branch, Community Relations Division
- Eric T. de JonckheereColonel, USAF, Deputy for Technology and Subsystems
- Donald H. MenzelDirector of Astronomy at Harvard University