Declassified UFO / UAP Document
Analysis of Suspected Meteorite
AI-Generated Summary
A specimen suspected to be a meteorite, acquired in Europe by Dr. Ernst Steinhoff, was analyzed by the Air Force Materials Laboratory. The laboratory determined the object was primarily quartz and an inorganic silicate, not a meteorite.
This document details the laboratory evaluation of a specimen acquired in Europe by Dr. Ernst Steinhoff, the Chief Scientist at the Air Force Missile Development Center (AFMDC). On September 3, 1964, Dr. Steinhoff obtained a small piece of material that was alleged to be a fragment of a larger meteorite. Following his return, the specimen was forwarded to the Aeronautical Systems Division at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base for technical analysis. The material was assigned Analytical Branch number 4-1591. The laboratory conducted several tests, including X-ray diffraction, infrared spectroscopy, and spectrographic analysis. The X-ray diffraction yielded no pattern, while the infrared spectrum indicated the presence of an inorganic silicate rather than organic material. The spectrographic analysis identified various elements, including silicon, magnesium, aluminum, iron, and calcium. Based on these findings, the Materials Physics Division concluded that the specimen was a form of inorganic silicate and explicitly stated that it was not a meteorite. The report was prepared by 2d Lt. Paul M. Maslona and reviewed by Captain S. Morrisey. The findings were subsequently communicated to the AFMDC at Holloman Air Force Base, with instructions to return the specimen and the associated documentation. The correspondence includes a translation of a letter from the original source of the material, who had suggested that the specimen possessed a hardness of 6-8 and could potentially be used as a radiation-shielding coating in a pulverized state. The document concludes with administrative notes confirming the location of the artifact in the 'Artifact Room' and the storage of the physical specimen in a separate folder.
The sample appears to be a form of inorganic silicate and therefore, not a form of meteorite.
PDF not loading? Download the PDF directly
Official Assessment
The sample appears to be a form of inorganic silicate and therefore, not a form of meteorite.
Lab analysis of the specimen, assigned Analytical Branch No. 4-1591, determined it was primarily quartz and not a meteorite. X-ray diffraction showed no pattern, and infrared spectrum analysis indicated an inorganic silicate.
Key Persons
- Dr. Ernst SteinhoffAFMDC Chief Scientist
- Sgt. MoodySubmitted sample for analysis
- Howard L. ConkeyLt Col, USAF, Deputy for Foreign Technology
- Doctor S. MorriseyAsst. Chief, Analytical Branch, Materials Physics Division
- Eric T. de JonckheereColonel, USAF, Deputy for Technology and Subsystems
- Victor E. Seyen, Jr.Translator