Declassified UFO / UAP Document

Project 10073 Record Card — Sighting of 11 February 1964, Brooklyn, New York

📅 11 Feb 64 📍 Brooklyn, New York 🏛 Foreign Technology Division 📄 Correspondence and Record Card

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

A civilian reported eight white, oval-shaped objects in Brooklyn on February 11, 1964. The Air Force evaluated the report under Project 10073, concluding that the data was insufficient and suggesting the objects could have been reflections or a meteor.

This document archive details a UFO sighting reported by a civilian in Brooklyn, New York, on the night of February 11, 1964. The witness, while walking home, observed eight white, oval-shaped objects traveling in a tight formation. The objects appeared to have substance, were approximately three-quarters the diameter of the moon, and were described as being slightly fuzzy around the edges, as if glowing. The witness reported that the objects moved in a straight line toward the Southeast and disappeared behind apartment buildings. The witness heard no sound and observed no engine noise. Following the event, the witness contacted the Air Force Information Service and subsequently submitted a formal letter and a sketch of the sighting to the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force. The Air Force Foreign Technology Division evaluated the report under Project 10073. Their assessment concluded that the data provided was too brief for a definitive evaluation. They suggested the objects might have been light reflections or a meteor (bolide), noting that while the objects lacked tails, a meteor could not be ruled out. The Air Force confirmed that no other reports of the sighting were received from the New York area at that time. Internal correspondence within the Air Force noted that the witness's drawing was reminiscent of the original Kenneth Arnold sighting, and there was interest in potentially following up with the witness for further information.

The Brooklyn case of 11 February would really have been a good one for the Atmospheric Optics group. This chap Laufer said that he would be glad to supply any further information. You realize that his drawing is quite similar to the original Arnold sighting.

Official Assessment

Possibly reflections of some sort. Possibly a meteor (bolide). Data too brief for evaluation.

The Air Force was unable to make a positive identification. The objects did not have tails, but a meteor could not be ruled out. No other reports were received from the New York area.

Witnesses

Key Persons

  • LauferIndividual who provided a drawing of the sighting
  • Maston M. JacksMajor, USAF, Public Information Division

Military Units