Declassified UFO / UAP Document
Project 10073 Record Card — Burlington, Massachusetts, 25 May 1962
AI-Generated Summary
The document details an Air Force investigation into a 1962 UFO sighting in Burlington, Massachusetts, which was ultimately dismissed as a hoax due to inconsistencies in the provided photographic evidence. It includes correspondence between the witness and the Air Force, highlighting the official rejection of the claim.
This document contains a collection of records related to a UFO sighting reported by a resident of Woburn, Massachusetts, on 25 May 1962. The witness, a mason contractor and self-described amateur astronomer, reported observing a saucer-shaped object in Burlington, Massachusetts, while working on a chimney. He claimed the object was bluish-grey, the size of a basketball, and traveled at an estimated 1500 mph at an altitude of 1500 feet. The witness provided four Polaroid photographs of the object, which he claimed to have taken while the object was in flight. The Air Force, through Project Blue Book, investigated the report and subsequently dismissed it as an 'obvious hoax.' The official evaluation noted that the photographs were sharply outlined with no lateral blurring, which was inconsistent with the witness's claim of a 1500 mph speed. Furthermore, the witness's admission that he did not allow the necessary 60-second development time for the Polaroid film, combined with the photographic evidence suggesting a 30-second exposure, led investigators to conclude the images were fabricated. The file also references a separate sighting from 1 November 1962 in Woburn, which the Air Force attributed to psychological causes. The correspondence between the witness and the Air Force, specifically Major Maston M. Jacks, reflects a contentious relationship, with the Air Force eventually informing the witness that they would no longer provide additional information or engage in lengthy discourse, as he was not considered a member of the press or a bona fide researcher.
In view of the inconsistencies by the stated report and the photographs submitted the case has been evaluated as an obvious hoax.
PDF not loading? Download the PDF directly
Official Assessment
The photographs are considered obvious hoaxes for the following reasons: the four photographs were taken by a Polaroid Camera. The speed of the object indicated by the principle witness, [illegible], was estimated at 1500 mph yet the objects show no lateral blurring and are sharply outlined. Also, the witness stated that the photos were taken without giving the necessary 60 second delay in developing time. He stated that he pulled the slide as fast as he could. The photographs indicate at least a 30 second exposure.
The sighting was evaluated as an obvious hoax due to inconsistencies between the witness's report and the photographic evidence.
Witnesses
- [illegible]Mason contractor
Key Persons
- Maston M. JacksMajor, USAF, Public Information Division