Declassified UFO / UAP Document

Report on Unidentified Flying Object (UFO) — Wayside Park, Florida, 23 May 1961

📅 23 May 61 📍 Wayside Park, Florida 🏛 Aerospace Technical Intelligence Center (AFCIN) 📄 sighting_report

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

A 1961 UFO sighting report from Tyndall AFB involving a stationary red object observed over the Gulf of Mexico. The Air Force concluded the report was based on conflicting witness information and likely attributed the sighting to atmospheric refraction.

This document is a formal report regarding an Unidentified Flying Object (UFO) sighting that occurred on May 23, 1961, near Wayside Park in Mexico Beach, Florida. The report was prepared by MSGT Henry J. Lacour of the 4756th Air Base Group at Tyndall Air Force Base and forwarded to the Aerospace Technical Intelligence Center at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. The primary witness, SSGT Charles A. Baumgart, reported observing a stationary, firey red object with two humps for approximately 30 minutes. The witness described the object as having a bright red light, a red haze, and a small dot of light. According to the witness, he and his family observed the object after returning home from Port St. Joe, eventually driving to Wayside Park to get a better view. The witness stated the object appeared to be a blaze in the Gulf, but noted it lacked the typical characteristics of a fire, such as shooting flames. The official evaluation of the sighting concluded that the information provided by the witness was conflicting, specifically noting that while the witness claimed the object was in the Gulf, the directional data provided (northwest) was inconsistent with the geography of the area. The investigators determined that the witness likely did not know the correct directions from his location. Consequently, the case was classified as having 'insufficient evidence,' with the official conclusion suggesting that atmospheric refraction was likely responsible for the sighting of a light source that would normally have been below the horizon. The report includes sketches of the object and maps of the area, as well as a warning regarding small arms range danger areas near Tyndall Air Force Base, which may have been relevant to the context of the sighting location.

This case is classed as 'insufficient evidence' but there is strong indication that atmospheric refraction was responsible for the witnesses viewing some light source which would normally have been below horizon.

Official Assessment

This case is classed as 'insufficient evidence' but there is strong indication that atmospheric refraction was responsible for the witnesses viewing some light source which would normally have been below horizon.

The witness report was considered conflicting because the witness described the object as being in the Gulf, yet provided a direction of northwest. Comparison with local maps indicated the witness did not know the directions from his location.

Witnesses

Key Persons