Declassified UFO / UAP Document
Project 10073 Record Card — Sighting in Troy, Ohio, 3 January 1961
AI-Generated Summary
A civilian in Troy, Ohio, reported a wingless, silent, shiny white object in 1961. The Air Force concluded the report was inconsistent and insufficient for identification.
This document contains a Project 10073 record card and associated correspondence regarding a UFO sighting reported by a civilian in Troy, Ohio, on January 3, 1961. The witness, an 18-year-old male, reported observing a bright, shiny white object at approximately 3:45 PM. He described the object as having the appearance of a high-flying jet but noted it lacked wings and produced no sound or vapor trail. The object traveled in a smooth, fast, and straight line from an east-northeast to west-northwest direction before disappearing into clouds. The witness provided detailed sketches and completed a U.S. Air Force Technical Information Sheet, expressing his belief that the object was something different from a conventional aircraft, balloon, or weather phenomenon. The Air Force initially responded to the witness on January 16, 1961, through Lt. Colonel Lawrence J. Tacker, stating that the initial report contained insufficient information for a valid conclusion and requesting the completion of a formal questionnaire. The final evaluation by the Aerospace Technical Intelligence Center (ATIC) concluded that the report was inconsistent, specifically noting conflicting elevation estimates provided by the witness. The official assessment suggested the witness might have observed a high-flying aircraft, but concluded that it was impracticable to identify the specific aircraft due to the high volume of air traffic in the area at the time.
I don't want to state flatly 'flying saucer' but neither do I want to say it was a plane or balloon or weather phenomenon.
PDF not loading? Download the PDF directly
Official Assessment
Parts of the report are inconsistent, e.g., witness gave more than one elevation for the object when he first saw it. Witness possibly saw a high flying a/c; however, due to large number of a/c flying in this area it is impracticable to attempt to determine what a/c was in the area at the time.
The report was deemed inconsistent and insufficient for a valid conclusion.
Witnesses
- [illegible]Civilian
Key Persons
- Lawrence J. TackerLt. Colonel, USAF, Public Information Division