Declassified UFO / UAP Document

Project 10073 Record Card and Correspondence — Marietta & Duncannon, Pennsylvania, December 14, 1960

📅 14 Dec 60 📍 Marietta & Duncannon, Pennsylvania 🏛 ATIC 📄 Record Card and Correspondence

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

A sighting of a bright, trail-leaving object on December 14, 1960, was reported by multiple witnesses in Pennsylvania and Connecticut. The Air Technical Intelligence Center concluded the object was a meteor.

This document contains a Project 10073 record card and associated correspondence regarding a sighting on December 14, 1960. A civilian witness, while driving on the Connecticut Turnpike between Bridgeport and Stamford, observed a rapidly moving red object crossing the sky from west to east. The witness reported that the object initially glowed bright red and left a trail, then experienced a sudden intensity change similar to a flash bulb, after which the trail turned white. The witness noted the object appeared much closer and brighter than typical falling stars. A separate report from a civilian guard at Marietta AFS, Pennsylvania, described a similar event, noting the object was round, the size of a mush ball, and left a trail at least 10 miles long. Major Edward Borresen, a pilot from Olmsted AFB, also reported seeing a meteor while flying east of Patterson AFB, Ohio, at the same time. The official conclusion reached by the Air Technical Intelligence Center (ATIC) was that the object was a meteor. Investigators noted that the witness's perception of the object landing behind buildings was an illusion caused by the difficulty of estimating the distance of such bright objects, which often appear closer than they actually are.

It was not considered unusual for the witness to indicate that the object had landed. Brightness of these meteors leaves us with the impression that they are much closer than they really are.

Official Assessment

It is our opinion that the object was a meteor.

The object was identified as a meteor. The witness's belief that the object fell behind buildings was attributed to an illusion caused by distance estimation.

Witnesses

Key Persons

Military Units