Declassified UFO / UAP Document
Project 10073 Record Cards — Dayton, Ohio, December 1960
AI-Generated Summary
This document contains two UFO sighting reports from Dayton, Ohio, in December 1960. Both cases were filed under Project 10073 and concluded as having insufficient data for evaluation.
This document contains two Project 10073 record cards documenting UFO sightings in Dayton, Ohio, during December 1960, along with a forwarding memorandum from the Aerospace Technical Intelligence Center (ATIC). The first sighting occurred on December 3, 1960, at 2315 local time. The witness described a red ball of fire with a shooting flame that changed from a silver glow to a reddish glow before fading from sight. The object moved in a northwest direction. The report notes that the originator could not be contacted for further information, leading to a conclusion of insufficient data. The second sighting occurred on December 16, 1960, at 2115 local time. The observer, located inside a building, reported a bright white light at an elevation of 60-70 degrees. The object reportedly moved at various speeds, circled, and appeared to turn off and on. The report indicates the witness was a student and that the information provided was too general for a valid conclusion, suggesting a possibility of light reflection. A memorandum dated December 19, 1960, from Captain John C. McNeill of the Aerospace Technical Intelligence Center to Major Friend, forwards the report from Captain Rinearson regarding this second sighting. The documentation includes multiple copies of the standard U.S. Air Force Technical Information Sheet questionnaire, which were used to collect witness data. Both cases were ultimately filed under Project 10073 with the conclusion that there was insufficient data for evaluation.
The originator of this report could not be contacted for further information. Since the data is so limited in nature, case is categorized as insufficient data.
PDF not loading? Download the PDF directly
Official Assessment
Insufficient Data for Evaluation
Both sightings were categorized as having insufficient data for a valid conclusion. The 3 Dec sighting was limited in nature. The 16 Dec sighting involved students who were difficult to contact, and the report noted a possibility of light reflection.
Witnesses
- [illegible]Civilian
Key Persons
- Maj FriendRecipient of forwarded report
- Capt RinearsonOriginator of report dated 16 Dec 60