Declassified UFO / UAP Document

Project 10073 Record Card — Arcata, California, 9 April 1960

📅 9 April 1960 📍 Arcata, California 🏛 Air Technical Intelligence Center (ATIC) 📄 sighting_report

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

A civilian photographer captured an image of a spherical object while photographing the sun. The Air Force concluded the object was a photographic emulsion defect, despite the witness's technical arguments to the contrary.

This document details the investigation of a UFO sighting reported by a civilian in Arcata, California, on 9 April 1960. The witness, an amateur astronomer and newspaper photographer, captured a photograph of the setting sun through an 8-inch telescope. Upon developing the film, he observed a spherical object in the image. He submitted the photographs and negatives to the Air Force for analysis. The Air Technical Intelligence Center (ATIC) conducted a thorough review of the materials, consulting with experts in the Air Sciences Division, the Photo Processing Branch, and the Equipment Support Branch. The official Air Force conclusion was that the object was not a physical entity but rather a defect in the photographic emulsion. The report notes that the witness strongly disagreed with this assessment, providing a detailed technical argument for why the object was a real, spherical, translucent entity in the atmosphere, potentially 10 to 400 feet in diameter. The Air Force maintained its position, citing that the spot was a common type of emulsion defect and that no diffraction was detectable. The correspondence includes technical data regarding the telescope's specifications, weather conditions at the time of the sighting, and the subsequent exchange between the witness and the Air Force regarding the validity of the photographic evidence. The case was ultimately closed with the determination that the object was an artifact.

Analysis of the photograph led to the opinion that the spot was a defect in the emulsion.

Official Assessment

Analysis of the photograph led to the opinion that the spot was a defect in the emulsion.

The object was determined to be a photographic artifact, specifically a defect in the emulsion, rather than a real object.

Witnesses

Key Persons