Declassified UFO / UAP Document

Project 10073 Record Cards and Correspondence — Houston, Texas, January 1958

📅 January 3, 1958; January 12, 1958; January 14, 1958 📍 Houston, Texas 🏛 AFCIN-4E 📄 Correspondence and Record Cards

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

The Air Force investigated three civilian UFO reports from Houston, Texas, in January 1958. All reports were ultimately dismissed as either bolides, jet aircraft, or ground-based burning objects due to insufficient data.

This document collection contains Project 10073 record cards and official Air Force correspondence regarding three separate UFO sightings reported by a civilian in Houston, Texas, in January 1958. The witness, who wrote to TIME magazine, described three distinct events. On January 3, 1958, the witness observed a star-like object descending near the constellation Cygnus. On January 12, 1958, the witness reported seeing a brilliant, orange-colored object that appeared to be burning, which they observed through binoculars. On January 14, 1958, the witness reported seeing four oval-shaped objects flying in formation at low altitude, which they estimated to be under 150 feet. The witness speculated that these objects might be related to operations at Ellington Field. The Air Force response, authored by Major Lawrence J. Tacker and Nicholas Post, dismissed the reports as unreliable. The Air Force stated they had no record of a burning object on January 12 and suggested the January 14 objects were likely high-flying jet aircraft. The January 3 sighting was later categorized by the Air Force as a bolide. The correspondence highlights the Air Force's frustration with civilian reporting methods, noting that the witness should have contacted local police or fire departments rather than a national magazine. The documents emphasize the difficulty of evaluating sightings without accurate data, such as photographs, precise azimuths, or bearings.

My private theory is that Ellington field, about 20 miles southeast of my house, where many jets are in operation, knows something about these objects.

Official Assessment

Insufficient data for evaluation; bolide (Jan 3); probably high flying jet aircraft (Jan 14); not a flying object (Jan 12).

The Air Force determined that the reports were unreliable due to lack of data and the nature of the observations. The January 3 sighting was suggested to be a bolide, the January 12 sighting was dismissed as a ground-based burning object, and the January 14 sighting was attributed to high-flying jet aircraft.

Witnesses

Key Persons

Military Units