Declassified UFO / UAP Document

Project 10073 Record Card — 17 Mi S of Minot, North Dakota, 30 November 1957

📅 30 November 1957 📍 17 Mi S of Minot, North Dakota 🏛 Air Technical Intelligence Center 📄 Sighting report and record card

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

A radar technician observed an unidentified target on an FPS-6 radar scope near Minot, North Dakota, in 1957. The military concluded the event was likely a false radar return caused by equipment malfunction during maintenance.

This document consists of a Project 10073 record card and an associated military teletype report regarding an unidentified radar contact observed on 30 November 1957, near Minot, North Dakota. The sighting involved a single radar return, described as a one-inch blip on an HRI (Height Range Indicator) FPS-6 radar scope. The object was observed to climb from an altitude of 5,000 feet to 25,000 feet and travel 100 miles in a straight line over a duration of 20 seconds. The report was filed by the 786th ACW Squadron. The witness, A/2C Charles A. Wagner, was a radar maintenance technician with five months of experience. Following an investigation, it was determined that the radar equipment was under the control of maintenance personnel at the time of the incident. The official conclusion reached by the Air Technical Intelligence Center was that the radar return was likely a false target caused by equipment malfunction or testing, rather than an actual aerial object. The report highlights that the equipment may not have been in perfect adjustment and that the antenna might not have been rotating, as the azimuth of the target remained constant throughout the observation. It is noted that regular operating personnel might have been more reliable observers than the maintenance staff involved.

It is concluded that possibly a false target due to equipment malfunction rather than an actual target caused the rptd radar paint.

Official Assessment

It is concluded that possibly a false target due to equipment malfunction rather than an actual target caused the rptd radar paint.

The radar equipment was under the control of maintenance personnel at the time of the sighting, suggesting it may not have been in perfect adjustment or was being used for target simulation. The antenna may not have been rotating, and the target's azimuth remained constant throughout the interception.

Witnesses

Military Units