Declassified UFO / UAP Document

Project 10073 Record Card — Cincinnati, Ohio, 18 July 1957

📅 18 July 1957 📍 Cincinnati, Ohio 🏛 ATIC 📄 Record Card and Technical Information Sheet

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

A 1957 UFO sighting report from Cincinnati, Ohio, was classified as 'insufficient data' due to the witness's contradictory and vague testimony. The Air Force investigators noted the witness could not provide basic details about the objects.

This document comprises a Project 10073 record card and an associated U.S. Air Force Technical Information Sheet regarding a UFO sighting in Cincinnati, Ohio, on July 18, 1957. The witness reported observing four objects between 2130 and 2215 EST. The objects were described as appearing like bright stars, with two flying in parallel and one being pinkish-red in color. The witness claimed the objects made no sound. Despite the report, the investigating personnel, including an individual named Stringfield, found the witness's testimony to be highly unreliable. The record card explicitly notes that the witness provided contradictory statements and was unable to provide basic data such as size, shape, elevation, or direction. The witness also contradicted themselves across different items in the questionnaire. Consequently, the Air Technical Intelligence Center (ATIC) concluded that the case contained insufficient data for evaluation and placed it in that category. The documentation includes the original record card, a memo routing slip, and the completed technical information sheet, which contains handwritten notes from investigators expressing frustration with the lack of usable information provided by the witness.

Due to meager information and conflicting statements, placed in insufficient data category.

Official Assessment

Due to meager information and conflicting statements, placed in insufficient data category.

The witness provided conflicting information and was unable to provide basic details regarding size, shape, or elevation.

Witnesses

Key Persons